《难以置信的事实》讲述什么样的故事?
Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career. Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.) As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisonerpenitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone (I'm a mechanic), yet the symbolism is rich he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played. The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . You need a woman not a girl) is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly arty and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual am notare too argument). Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the unbelievable truth of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
1、《难以置信的事实》是在哪一年上映的?
《难以置信的事实》是霍尔·哈特利于1989年拍摄上映的一部经典喜剧片。此片开创了美国当代喜剧片的先河,《难以置信的事实》上映时票房稳坐国内外前三,创下当年最佳纪录。在当时安德林妮·夏莉,罗伯特·约翰·伯克,马特·马洛伊,凯莉·莱卡特均为最佳演员,安德林妮·夏莉,罗伯特·约翰·伯克,马特·马洛伊,凯莉·莱卡特以精彩演技和完美的形象,奠定在美国影视地位。安德林妮·夏莉,罗伯特·约翰·伯克,马特·马洛伊,凯莉·莱卡特饰演角色多年后仍为大众争相模仿。霍尔·哈特利之前曾被人怀疑其能力,而《难以置信的事实》却奠定霍尔·哈特利喜剧片风格。《难以置信的事实》首映时曾获海外喜剧片和媒体广泛好评,被认为其优秀程度,是足以与同时期(指1980年代)好莱坞(好莱坞)优秀喜剧片齐名。
2、被称为喜剧片的开先河之作的《难以置信的事实》,是霍尔·哈特利最好的作品吗?
从霍尔·哈特利斩获喜剧片最佳导演 我就觉得这部《难以置信的事实》是他最好的喜剧片。虽然霍尔·哈特利后来还拍出来了评价特别好的喜剧片,但是《难以置信的事实》是他喜剧片的代表作品。
3、《难以置信的事实》为什么能成为经典之作?
提起美国喜剧片,人们就肯定会说出《难以置信的事实》的名字。这部由霍尔·哈特利导演,安德林妮·夏莉,罗伯特·约翰·伯克,马特·马洛伊,凯莉·莱卡特主演的《难以置信的事实》,在当时,真的是成为了一匹黑马,杀出了一条血路,创造了一个奇迹。为何会这么说,我想,就连霍尔·哈特利导演和安德林妮·夏莉,罗伯特·约翰·伯克,马特·马洛伊,凯莉·莱卡特,都没想到这部喜剧片会得到这样好的反响。霍尔·哈特利先生曾说过,这是一群失意的人凑到了一起创作出来的一部作品。因为在《难以置信的事实》开拍之前,安德林妮·夏莉,罗伯特·约翰·伯克,马特·马洛伊,凯莉·莱卡特已经有4年无戏可拍,而安德林妮·夏莉,罗伯特·约翰·伯克,马特·马洛伊,凯莉·莱卡特主演的喜剧片,票房始终不理想,这样的几个人凑在了一起,也真是缘分!所以,正是这样的失意感和强烈的自尊心,他们在喜剧片中投入的热情,是我们难以想象的,其实《难以置信的事实》中的人物心理历程和感人的剧情,何尝不是现实中他们的真实写照呢?所以,他们怀着一腔心有不甘的英雄气,用他们的实力和人情成就了这部经典喜剧片,也成就了他们自己!
4、如何评价《难以置信的事实》?
《难以置信的事实》口碑非常好深受广大观众喜爱,《难以置信的事实》一经播放立刻引来无数人关注,不仅安德林妮·夏莉,罗伯特·约翰·伯克,马特·马洛伊,凯莉·莱卡特演的好而且该喜剧片故事情节也非常紧凑,神马影院(slkygs.com)观看起来特别流畅同时还能扣人心弦,即使目前《难以置信的事实》收视率不佳但是该片目前受欢迎程度已经蒸蒸日上。该喜剧片主演安德林妮·夏莉,罗伯特·约翰·伯克,马特·马洛伊,凯莉·莱卡特,她在该喜剧片中的演技可圈可点,受到安德林妮·夏莉,罗伯特·约翰·伯克,马特·马洛伊,凯莉·莱卡特演的好而且该喜剧片迷的认可。
5、《难以置信的事实》喜剧片的主要内容
《难以置信的事实》是一部喜剧片喜剧片,由导演:霍尔·哈特利执导,主演:安德林妮·夏莉,罗伯特·约翰·伯克,马特·马洛伊,凯莉·莱卡特,
Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career. Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.) As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisonerpenitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone (I'm a mechanic), yet the symbolism is rich he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played. The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . You need a woman not a girl) is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly arty and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual am notare too argument). Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the unbelievable truth of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
6、《难以置信的事实》是霍尔·哈特利导演的一部经典的喜剧美国片大全,该剧讲述了:Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal,想看更多的相关影视作品,请收藏我们的网站:slkygs.com
Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career. Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.) As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisonerpenitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone (I'm a mechanic), yet the symbolism is rich he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played. The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . You need a woman not a girl) is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly arty and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual am notare too argument). Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the unbelievable truth of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.